Thursday, May 31, 2007

Today I got my grades in and as I reflected on student comments I decided to publish my thoughts on Spring 2007 as a point of clarity and as a way to address some of the issues more than one student commented on.

I know how to write because I write. This is the primary reason why I know how to do what I do. It's that simple. I think writing is a skill one begins to feel at ease with the more one participates in the process. In my classes students write and read and rewrite and read and critique and think about the writing they just completed and rewrite and get sick of the whole thing and go eat some ice cream and take a nap or go for a walk and then reread the writing that sucked to see where it can go--sometimes that means in an entirely different direction. Being a writer means one is open to discovery. It means enjoying the ride because you don't always know what the destination is. It means literally trusting the process--all the invention techniques: frewriting, clustering, mapping, listing, outlining, etc. The goal is to keep the pen moving until the page is filled with enough material to fulfill the purpose for a first draft of the exercise/assignment.

All that was certain this spring semester was the room we met in--and even that changed from time to time. Unlike Montaigne, we did not sit in towers tossing essays to those below. No. Writing is not an isolated activity for most of us. We write out loud in the theatre with an active participatory vocal and opinionated audience we must entertain as we engage them with the hope they'll be silent long enough to read what we have to say.

The center of attention has shifted over time like the land mass did during the continental drift which is why we are so distant now as a species, and as a human race.

I feel as if I should just put on the syllabus: "All that is certain here is change, so buckle up. Oh, bring along your driving manual (Hacker), paper, a necessity as is a college dictionary, and an open mind and a willingness to be engaged.

"Wear comfortable clothing and be ready to move and be moved philosophically and intellectually.

"This is a class for people who enjoy thinking about ideas: where thoughts come from how these often random ideas end up beliefs, values and truths we can't seem to shake. Why is it hard to let go of some more than others?"

Students said they were confused when they read the blog because what they heard in class often differed from the posted assignment. The blog was my way to reflect to the class the journey that day. Often the plan was transformed because those present needed it to change. Also, the blog reflected all the classes that day, and was a synthesis of dominant themes.

I remember all the essays I read this semester. I especially recall the students who revised their essays until we were both happy with them. I appreciated their hard work and the results of that work. I tried to offer assistance to students on the portfolio process those final weeks and some students took advantage of this, others did not and their grades reflect this absence of evidence to support one grade over another. We spent weeks on the research essay. I read some essays two-three-four times. I thought I was generous in the final grades especially those students who were missing work; however, if there was no research essay this semester, and this was the key focus of the English 1A course, then I could not in good conscious pass you. I also could not pass you if I couldn't see development in your writing over the 18 weeks.

Some students received As, not because their writing was the best it can be, of course it isn't, but if writing is a process and these students have a better undertanding of their style, its strengths and weaknesses, then the writing can only get stronger and clearer.

This class was also about self-discovery.

The structure was loose; our class more like a jam session where you bring in your instrument and we sit around and compose melodies based on themes, in this case, nature vs, nurture. The assumptions was we're all musicians (writers), so I don't need to tell you how to hold the sticks or how to hit the trap, or what a snare drum is, why the high hat is called such or where the crash cymbal is. We're all sitting there in the woodshed (practice room) with our drum pads composing. Every now and then we'll all stop and listen to a solo, give the artist some feedback then get back to our own work in progress. In the end we have a concert, the rough melodies now music. This only works if each participant stays in tune with what she needs as her individual project develops. One must be prepared to handle the new challenges.

I think this is the ultimate in reflective teaching and stimulus in a reflective learning environment--ownership of the process, a place where we all take responsibility for what happens in the learning laboratory. One of my students who actually liked the flexibility in the schedule, said that I tried to engage all the students' intelligences.

I think this fall, we'll begin each class with a list of discussion topics that we develop on the spot: What do you want to talk about today? Students responsible for supplying one item each meeting. I'll have some standard items for days when the brainwaves are shorting out.

Of course, given the nature of the community college, I do and did start with the rudiments, which I went over early: the structure of an essay and how to develop a thesis, argumentation and other rhetorical styles, the importance of annotating, how to summarize, the importance of planning, and how to develop an outline, how to evaluate and cite sources, and examples of different kinds of conclusions and a survey of logical fallacies.

It was difficult this semester to have meamingful discussions because when the structure is fluid and everyone is not committed, which means prepared, we can't get any work done, or very little. This is why we ran out of time. This is why morale dropped. This is an aspect of the course I cannot control.

Perhaps if I had been more up front, then those students who needed a disciplinarian would have opted out early on for a teacher who was more a guardian or parent, someone who locked doors, paddled them on their knuckles when they were "bad," used a behavior modification slash/punitive disciplinary model.

I think we are all adults and responsible for ourselves. If time management is an issue there are classes one can take. If you are bored, perhaps you should be reading more in your field, deepening the gaze-- expanding what's possible.

Ultimately, you are responsible for your education, so if you want to get the most out of the time you are spending, then take an active role in this learning process. Complaining to the dean and dropping classes because you missed a turn or let go and fell off, is not always the most prudent methodology. Sometimes it's better to find the conductor and spend some time with her mapping out an educational plan best suited for you.

I think all the instructors are here because we want you to be successful, whatever that means and it changes from student to student, semester to semester. I think ultimately, one wants to leave a composition class more literate, more thoughtful, and more polished a writer. None of us has time to waste, so if you are not getting what you want, then ask for it.

I am going to continue the cyber process. We are in a technological age and cyber communication might take adjusting to, but many colleges are moving towards a paperless environment for non-cyber courses. There are short term courses you can take to become computer literate, learn power point, etc., and we have several free labs on campus, so there is no excuse.

Thursday, May 17, 2007

We had a great final meeting today. Monday, May 21, from 12-2 p.m. I'll be available in L-235 for a study session with students who want to work on their portfolios here. Please bring copies of an abstract for your classmates for the Wednesday, May 23, 8-10 a.m. final presentations. We will meet in L-235. If you have technology needs please call me or shoot me an email. I will be here everyday next week.

I think I will keep my office hours: 10:30-12. Thursday, I will be grading portfolios. Make certain I have your contact information: Name, address, email, phone number. Sometimes when I'm reading I have questions and when there is a number, I call.

I mailed essays to students this afternoon that you probably forgot your wrote. These would be perfect to site as examples in your second essay. I'm speaking
of The Making of a Criminal, Eros, Philia and Agape, MLK III, and the King Holiday Reflection.

Abstract
The check-list is to handout prior to the presentation, which should be about 5 minutes. Please rehearse in advance. Answer the following questions: Who is your social entrepreneur? Why was s/he moved to change something in society or what was the problem? What was the solution? What are the measurable outcomes?

Library in Ethiopia
Camille Hopkins, Students Services Coordinator, F-Building, (510)748-2280, is sending books to supply a library in East Africa. She wanted me to ask everyone if you had any books you could donate to the effort. You can take them by her office. She is located in the same place where you get your student ID cards.

Friday, May 11, 2007

Hamlet and the Portfolio Checklist

We are not going to finish Hamlet in class, so we will have to read it at home and discuss highlights in class. The later class (9-10) needs to read up to Act 3 Scene 1 (134). Your classmates made the suggestion. In the earlier class (8-9) at least familiarize yourself with the text so you can follow it more easily.

The portfolio narratives
1. The narrative will look at the 18 weeks, the themes we looked at this semester, nature vs. nurture, and how what you've learned and discovered this semester about writing and yourself, college and life, have transformed or changed you. The narrative will also look at what lessons you plan to carry forward into your lifelong pursuit of learning. Please also comment on the texts and whether or not they were helpful in this process. You can also talk about the instruction, culture of the class and the teacher.

2. The second part of the narrative looks at the writing process and what you have learning about yourself as a writer. Take two essays and talk about the planning, research and revision strategies you used. It helps to choose an early paper and compare to a later paper. Often you can more easily see the differences in your writing and a better example of mastery of certain concepts. Also discuss skills you need to improve and how you plan to address that.

I will give you a check list with the essays you have written Monday, May 14. All you need to do is put a grade next to the essay. I'd like you to make me a copy of the freewrites and any other pre-writing activities you did in class for Thursday, May 17. (If you'd like me to make the copies, I can.)

Besides the two essays, I also want you to include the midterm essay and research essay. We will work on the narratives together next Thursday, May 17 in the Writing Lab.

The other essays we've written are: The Making of a Criminal, Love, (plus presentation), MLK Jr., State of the Union, Alice Walker assignments, We Are the One's We've Been Waiting For midterm, Visual Argument, War in Iraq, Frankenstein, Trial prep, Research on Frankenstein and Walker, Hamlet reflections (extra credit for those who need it. Analyze the choices Hamlet makes that lead to his ruin. Suggest alternate choice(s) and show how his choice(s) might change the course of history.)

Students who submitted their Frankenstein essays, I posted your grades and a comment there. Good work!

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Today students developed essays in collaboration on the question of Dr. Victor Frankenstein's guilt or innocence. The cyber-assignment we were writing today is still due today.

If you do not get the essay in you have a zero. This is a high impact essay, not an exercise (see syllabus). The essay is to be 500 words minimally. Use the Mary Shelley's novel for evidence. You can also cite from the California Penal Code and your scholarly research earlier this semester. Please feel free to use any of your freewrites also.

Post your essay here. Read the earlier discussion on the topic for ideas.

Again, check the blog for the check-list before Monday. We will work on organizing our portfolios next week, Thursday in the lab. Bring all your work (essays on a disk or jump-drive).

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

I will post the portfolio check-list on the blog before Monday. I am still thinking about it. We are making great progress in Hamlet in the early English 1A. Presently we are almost at Act 3, Scene 3 (152). In the later class we are in Act 2, Scene 2 (108).

In the earlier class we have been considering arguments posed by the writing. Today we looked at "Hamlet on Love" or "Maternal Affection" and developed the following:

Although Hamlet's mother, Queen Gertrude, remarries quickly after the death of her first husband, the king, this does not mean she loves her dear son Hamlet any less, she's just a woman who knows how the play the game well.

(The "game" is politics.) We talk afterwards about how Gertrude would have been the queen and Hamlet her heir (similar to the situation in England today with Queen Elizabeth and Prince Charles)if she hadn't married. However, when Claudius married his sister-in-law, she gave him her power. Claudius inherited the position his brother vacated and she by default abdicated. Her action also jeopardized Hamlet's position. Any offspring born to this union could challenge his right to the throne.
Patrick said if would probably come down to who had the stronger army.

Most students have not responded to the cyber-essay. Don't get behind now. Post at the assignment site.

Could someone please send me the other thesis from yesterday so I can post it here along with the question or argument? Thanks!

Announcements
We had fun over at the Don Cheadle and John Prendergast lecture on Dafur. There book: Not on Our Watch is a guide to civil actism on issues of justice.

Please call 1-800-GENOCIDE for current legislation we need the president to act on to stop the killing.

Monday, May 07, 2007

Congratulations to everyone who got their essay in on time. To those who missed the deadline, your essays will lose one grade point for each day it is late. I am generally pleased with the level of writing and research for all the essays I've read so far. Some students exceeded my expectations. The common problem was a failure to proofread the essays before submission. I cannot stress enough the value of reading the essay aloud (in a loud voice) to yourself.

Don't forget to finish Elements of Style. We will have a short quiz.

Also you have a cyber-essay due by midnight today. See April 19 for the assignment. In the 9-10 a.m. English 1A class students were interested in writing about the Golden State Warriors instead of Virginia Tech and gun control. If you'd like to switch topics to another current event topic that is controversial or debatable, this is fine. All the elements of the assignment apply, so look at it.

Field trip

I reserved 20 tickets for this event. Email me at professorwandasposse@gmail.com to let me know if you are interested in attending and how many tickets you'd like.

Not on Our Watch: The Mission to End Genocide in Darfur and Beyond, a Community Conversation with Don Cheadle and John Prendergast, sponsored by Facing History and Ourselves and The Allstate Foundation, is Tuesday, May 8, 7-8:30 p.m.at the Nob Hill Masonic Auditorium | 1111 California Street @ Taylor, San Francisco

The Nob Hill Masonic Auditorium is located between Jones and Taylor streets, immediately opposite Grace Cathedral. Limited parking is available on-site for a special event rate of $15 per car, payable upon entry in CASH ONLY. There are other garages in the area; however, they do not offer discounted rates for attendees of Nob Hill Masonic Auditorium events.

Visit www.masonicauditorium.com/location.html for a local map, parking and driving directions, as well as public transportation information. You may also call (415) 292-9151 for directions.

Doors to the auditorium open at 6:00 PM. Tickets are general admission; please plan to arrive early for best seating. Stand-by seating will begin for non-ticket holders at 6:45 PM. If you have not arrived at the theatre by this time, you may forfeit your seat.

Other important details
The first 1,000 attendees will receive COMPLIMENTARY copies of Not on our Watch. Again, we encourage you to allow ample time for traffic and parking, plan to arrive early, and to ensure that you receive your copy of this highly-anticipated book! Not on Our Watch will also be available for purchase for $14.95 in the auditorium lobby.

No cameras, audio, or videotaping will be permitted for this event.

Thursday, May 03, 2007

In the early class our guest speaker P. Lewis got lost and arrived in class with only about 10 minutes to share his American Book Award-winning novel, Nate.

P. Lewis will be at Book Passage tomorrow night, Friday, May 4 at 7 p.m. I think. The book store is on The Embarcadero in San Francisco, which is walking distance from that BART station. He'll be reading with Reginald Lockett, Karla Brundage and Floyd Salas. I can vouch for the other three readers, they're good. Salas is funny and Reggie and Karla are fabulous poets. The event is free.

We read far into Hamlet, which was nice (8-9 class). The second class, had him for the entire hour. I'm not certain if that was a mixed blessing or not.
I found the author's discussion of existentialism interesting as it related to Hamlet and his protagonist Nate.

Where the discussion fell down for me was his long explanation of another work, Journey to the End of Night (?), which inspired his. The more Lewis told us about the other work and its characters, the more it sounded like the American Book Award should have gone to Louis-Ferdinand "Celine."

Though clearly enraptured with Celine, I wondered at the originality of Lewis' work as did Tahirah in a discussion after class with me. If one changes the names, locations and perhaps period of a work, can a person call that original work if the structure is otherwise similar, or is the new work an adaptation?

The French author, Louis-Ferdinand whose pen name "Celine," was a physician by training then novelist. The writer served in the war as a doctor and because of the tragedies he witnessed grew to hate mankind. He was what Lewis called a misanthopist.

Lewis said in answer to a question about his writing life that his dad was a litery critic and after reading Richard Wright's Native Son, he fell in love with literature and decided to be a writer. Nate took about 4 or 5 years to write and almost as long to publish. The author spoke of revisions numbering 1000s of pages.
Lewis has a degree in Fine Arts from Howard University.

Ferdinand reminded me a lot of Dr. Victor Frankenstein. Only the latter is a character in Mary Shelley's novel. Not a real person.

Lewis spoke also of the doubleness or "doppelganger" aspect at work in his novel, and in Ferdinand's work cited earlier. I don't recall the characters names who in both books kill themselves in grotesque ways.

Lewis has the Nate's friend, the doppelganger in the story kill himself also.
I mentioned that this doubleness is also at work in Frankenstein.
Lewis agreed and said ultimately, the doppelganger is the aspect men despise within themselves or hate and try to kill. If we look at Victor Frankenstein, the monster is that part of himself he wants to destroy.

In Hamlet's case, we'll have to see. I don't see this doubleness yet, unless his dead father plays this role. I see Hamlet as a youth who has much to bear and instead of not owning other's pain and responsibilities, he takes them on to his detriment.

Note:
I was mistaken, we actually have two more weeks of classes, so we can finish Hamlet as a read-a-loud. You have until May 14 to get your 10 hours logged in for the semester in the Writing Center (L-234).

Announcement:
Spike Lee will be signing copies of When the Levees Broke at Borders Union Square Friday, May 4, at 6 p.m. He was great at the San Francisco International Film Festival event last night.

Homework: Catch up on your reading and prepare for your Frankenstein essay. On your cyber-essay due next week, you can use my topic on Hand Gun Violence or choose one of your own. The only stipulation is that it has to be a current event topic, like the Warrior's basketball playoffs.